Brampton Will Find Out Soon If Itll be Amazons New Home

Brampton Will Find Out Soon If It\ll be Amazon\s New Home
Amazon HQ2 talks are stamp of approval for New York tech scene
The most exciting business news story of 2018 ended with a whimper this week as reports surfaced that Amazons HQ2 project would in fact be two smaller projects, one on Long Island City in Queens and the other in Crystal City across the Potomac from Washington, DC.

Opening two regional branch offices rather than opening a gigantic second headquarters makes pragmatic sense. So much sense, in fact, that its pretty much what every other large company on the planet does when it decides its home base cant fully accommodate its needs.

Keep abreast of significant corporate, financial and political developments around the world. Stay informed and spot emerging risks and opportunities with independent global reporting, expert commentary and analysis you can trust.

Amazon is reportedly headed to New York City — here are the neighborhoods that could start swelling with HQ2 workers

Indeed, it makes so much sense that one cant help but believe that this was the obvious solution all along (it is, after all, exactly what other companies do) and the entire concept of a unitary second headquarters was not much more than a publicity stunt designed to entice cities and states to put forward ultra-generous benefits packages only for Amazon to later underdeliver on jobs and investment.

Although its adjacent to Long Island City, the neighborhood has the advantage of slightly lower real-estate prices. The median rent in Astoria is around $2,200, compared to around $2,450 in Long Island City, and $3,400 in Manhattan. These prices could be attractive to young Amazon employees looking to save money and commute within their borough.

The question of local government subsidies to entice businesses remains an urgent one (see, for example, The Verges exposé of Scott Walkers disastrous $4.1 billion Foxconn boondoggle), but the HQ2 drama in many ways reveals an even bigger policy failure than that.

Simply put, while locating large pools of high-salary white collar positions in the New York and DC metro areas makes a ton of sense for Amazon, it doesnt actually make that much sense for either greater New York City or greater Washington. Amazons presence will tend to exacerbate those cities crises of housing affordability and overburdened transportation infrastructure.

Since the news of Amazons arrival was first reported by the New York Times, Long Island City residents have shared their concerns about overcrowded schools, congested subways, and failing infrastructure. These effects could spill over into adjacent neighborhoods, including those on the other side of the East River.

And it makes no sense at all for the United States of America, which urgently needs more economic opportunity in dozens of other metro areas that have a different set of problems.

New York City is abuzz with the news that Amazon might house half of its second headquarters in Long Island City— a Queens neighborhood thats teeming with growth. In recent years, the area has seen an influx of young professionals and new development, including high-rise condos and rental towers.

America needs to find a way to do better than this. Being the home to a very large share of the worlds most dynamic high tech companies is an incredible source of national strength, but in practical terms it does not benefit most Americans. With better policy it could.

p.neton37/Shutterstock As the home of the new Cornell Tech Campus, Roosevelt Island (technically part of Manhattan, though unattached geographically) is slowly filling up with tech workers and high-rise buildings, which have replaced the old prisons and hospitals that once scattered the neighborhood.

Video: Amazons HQ2 Will Reportedly Be Split Between Two Cities

The original pitch for HQ2 was tantalizing to mayors, governors, and real estate developers all across the land when it was released in September 2017. Amazon issued a request for proposals to become the home to a vast new corporate campus that promised 50,000 jobs spread across 8 million square feet of office space at an average salary of $100,000 a piece.

Amazon wanted a new base of operations, after all, primarily because the companys explosive growth was putting enormous strain on the city of Seattle. Despite a construction boom in the citys relatively small downtown, most of Seattles land area is zoned for single-family detached houses and it is ringed by suburbs that enact even more exclusionary zoning practices. Consequently, economic growth in Seattle has proven to be a double-edged sword, with rents soaring and many working-class residents not eligible for high-paid tech jobs left behind.

Washington, fueled by lobbyist money and proximity to power, has long since left behind its Chocolate City status and gentrified into a bland, low-slung landscape of gastropubs. In New York, though, our sheer size has allowed us to more easily process waves of money that would destroy lesser towns. Long Island City, where Amazon reportedly wants to move, is already a forest of newish glass towers, a neighborhood built especially for people who like luxury without character. But adding 25,000 Amazon employees there would obliterate the last vestiges of coolness in neighboring hoods like Greenpoint, once a quiet Polish neighborhood that now teeters on the edge of moneyed oblivion. A massive concentration of tech wealth is like a bomb that will ripple out in concentric circles of cultural destruction.

The city began to address this with a dramatic minimum wage hike, but also started moving to tax Amazon and other large employers to fund homelessness services. Amazon successfully spooked the City Council out of enacting that tax earlier this year. (The tax was not very well designed, but some experts argue it was about the best the city could do given the constraints of state law in Washington.) The fight confirms Amazon executives judgment that piling more and more eggs into the Seattle basket is fundamentally unworkable.

Even more importantly: Amazon is bad. It is monopolistic. It works its blue-collar and white-collar employees to the bone, prompting frequent exposés of its awful working conditions. New York City is a union town; Amazon is an anti-union company. Its owner should have his immoral hoard of wealth forcibly expropriated by the state before his power grows so great that all of society is warped by it. Jeff Bezoss money should immediately be put to use helping the public; instead, he cackles from inside his cartoonishly large mansion as cities and states desperately compete to shower his company with the maximum amount of public subsidies, in order to secure a glorified satellite office.

Hence the HQ2 sweepstakes naturally began to immediately fuel speculation about an Amazon-driven renaissance of a city like St. Louis or Baltimore thats fallen on difficult times.

If Amazon really wants to plop itself down in our city, it should abide by a few conditions. No taxpayer money should go to subsidize one of the wealthiest companies on earth; Amazon should cease union-busting, before it finds itself inundated by inflatable rats; and Jeff Bezos should pay to build housing for all 63,000 homeless people in New York, an expense that would not affect his lifestyle in the least. In return for these concessions, NYC residents will agree not to spit in your coffee or spray communist graffiti on your headquarters for the first month.

Speculation, however, began to focus very quickly on the Washington, DC, area since Amazon founder Jeff Bezos own the Washington Post and the largest mansion in the city. Whats more, Amazon already has a major data center in Northern Virginia. (Due to the internets origin as a Department of Defense project and the fact that AOL was originally based there, the area holds the physical location of much of the backbone of the internet.) The DC metro area does not, however, have a particularly reasonable location for a brand new office park of HQ2-type scale. The best place for it would probably be some largely vacant land out near Dulles Airport that wouldnt be particularly convenient to any urban lifestyle amenities.

Read more For a full year, Amazon – a trillion-dollar company led by the richest man on earth – has been busily extracting subsidies from cities across the country, all of them desperate to lure a promised 50,000 jobs and $5bn investment for Amazons second headquarters. The HQ2 became necessary after Amazon filled metropolitan Seattle edge-to-edge with glass towers full of Amazon employees.

So the plan, instead, is apparently to scale down the DC office to a size that would fit in the more conveniently located Crystal City neighborhood and supplement it with a similarly sized office in Queens. And the two locations have a bunch in common:

Amazon framed the hunt for its second headquarters as a national competition, with the winning city benefiting from an influx of tens of thousands of new jobs. But many are concerned about gentrification, rising housing costs, and an overall lack of transparency in the application process. Activists in DC and New York have opposed HQ2 for months.

Those common elements make them logical places for Amazon to establish big new offices, but also raise importation questions about whether the big new Amazon offices will actually be beneficial to anyone besides Amazon.

More than 200 local and state governments submitted proposals for Amazons consideration last year after the company announced it was looking for a North American city to house its $5 billion, 50,000-employee second headquarters. The companys home base is in Seattle.

Every jurisdiction in the running for HQ2 was offering Amazon various kinds of inducements, often secretly. With the HQ2 plan apparently scrapped in favor of the splitting plan, its not clear exactly what Amazon will be getting in exchange.

The company has yet to formally announce its decision, but according to news leaks, Amazon is planning to split its HQ2 between two sites: the Long Island City neighborhood of Queens and the Crystal City neighborhood of Arlington, a suburb of Washington, DC.

These benefits packages are always controversial and will naturally raise the question of whether whatever the public sector will be kicking in is worth the price. But the scarier news for places like New York and DC is the evidence that an Amazon-type influx might not be beneficial at all.

5 Total Updates Since May 3, 2018, 7:00am EDT Follow this stream November 9 The tragedy of Amazons HQ2 selections, explained By Matthew [email protected] /*

Amazons Strategic Move To Split HQ2

Over a decade ago, housing economists Janna Matlack and Jacob Vigdor investigated the economic impact of unequal economic development and found that in tight housing markets, the poor do worse when the rich get richer.

A tight housing market, in this case, is a market like greater New York or greater Washington, where the cost of buying a house greatly exceeds the actual construction costs of new buildings. The problem in markets like this is that when the rich get richer — say because a new office complex opens and hires 20,000 to 30,000 people for six-figure salaries — the price of scarce housing rises.

Keep abreast of significant corporate, financial and political developments around the world. Stay informed and spot emerging risks and opportunities with independent global reporting, expert commentary and analysis you can trust.

If you actually get a job at Amazon or have the kind of job skills that you plausibly could get a job at Amazon, this will pay off for you because youll end up with higher wages that more than equal the higher rent. But if you work in a restaurant or cut hair or clean houses or a drive cab, youll probably end up worse off.

This is, however, not an inevitable consequence of the rich getting richer. Matlack and Vigdor find that in housing markets that are slack — where there is either plenty of existing housing or it is easy to build new homes so that sale prices approximately equal construction costs — there are spillover benefits. In a slack market, the new rich people dont impact rents very much but their presence creates new working-class job opportunities. In the right location, in other words, a big new Amazon office park could have been a boon. But America didnt get the right location.

Amazon is said to be in the late stages of negotiations to build campuses in the Long Island City neighborhood of Queens, New York, and the Crystal City neighborhood in Arlington, Virginia, just outside Washington, The New York Times reported on Monday evening.

Of course, the fact that the housing markets in the DC and New York areas are tight is not a fact of nature.

This is especially clear in the case of Crystal City, which is part of a small dense corridor of development east of the highway US 1 that is immediately adjacent to the low-density single family home neighborhoods of Aurora Highlands and Arlington Ridge.

Theres nothing wrong with detached single-family homes, to be clear, but whats going on here is that its illegal to build anything more dense than that. If the law was changed to allow townhouses and apartment buildings to be built on that land, the area could accommodate a huge influx of new people who would live within a 10-to-30 minute walk from the new Crystal City office park as well as the job centers to the north around Pentagon City.

Thinking more regionally, the even-pricier close-in parts of the metro area — specifically the northern part of Arlington County, the portions of DC west of Rock Creek Park, and much of the Bethesda and Chevy Chase areas in Montgomery County — could easily accommodate huge amounts of transit-accessible development of the zoning code allowed it.

New York City is, overall, much denser than DC and thankfully does not ban apartment buildings across most of its terrain. Still, relative to prices, New York actually does very little building of new units these days. And the New York suburbs on Long Island have some of the most viciously exclusionary practices anywhere in America. And of course in Seattle itself where the problem of tight housing markets first started to bite Amazon, apartments are only legal in about 17 percent of the buildable land.

Amazons new second home? Crystal City is boring, corporate, and perfect for HQ2

Ending apartment bans (and related practices like regulatory parking minimums that do apply in most of New York even where apartments are legal) would not solve every housing policy problem in the United States. But it would greatly alleviate the middle-class housing crunch while generating new property tax revenue (rather than requiring subsidies) that could be used for housing vouchers or new public housing developments.

Of course, local policymakers are deeply reluctant to change their existing zoning practices because incumbent homeowners normally like neighborhoods to stay the way they are. But if they refuse to do so, the best cure for excessive government regulation of housing markets might be for the federal government to take a less laissez-faire attitude toward these major corporate relocation questions.

The economic impact of locating a new corporate campus with 20,000 highly paid jobs would be radically different in a city like Detroit, Cleveland, or Indianapolis for the simple reason that these cities have a lot of slack in their housing markets.

One easy way to see that is with an index that Issi Romem, an economist at Berkeley University, and BuildZoom created, which compares the average price of buying a house in a given metro area to the average replacement cost of a house in that area. The replacement cost is basically what you would need to spend to replace the house if it were destroyed in a tornado tomorrow.

Amazon plans to split HQ-2 in two locations

In a healthy housing market, the ratio should be a little bit higher than 1 because the cost of buying a house includes the price of land. But in a market suffering from a regulation-induced housing scarcity problem, the ratio will soar while in a depressed market suffering from very low demand the ratio ends up being below one.

New Yorkers are freaking out that Amazons HQ2 could cripple the subway system, but the reality is more complicated

Issi Romen/BuildZoom As you can see from this chart, New York and Washington already have some of the highest ratios in the country. Adding new high-end jobs to these very tight markets is only going to further squeeze the poor.

By contrast, adding a bunch of new jobs to one of the cities where the ratio is below 1 would be an incredibly useful local economic stimulus. Housing affordability is good, but when homes get more expensive to replace than to buy the market turns dysfunctional. Its no longer economically rational for landlords to invest in maintaining the properties they own. Middle-class homeowners tend to try to keep things in good order whether or not its economically rational, but that simply means people are pouring time and money into a money-losing investment.

Some of these cities are clearly too small to support an office complex on the scale Amazon is talking about. But downtown Cleveland already has about 100,000 jobs in it, which is (obviously) less than central Manhattan but about double Long Island City. And the Detroit metropolitan area has a slightly higher population than Greater Seattle, though the latter will quickly overtake it. Cleveland and Detroit also feature major airports that currently operate below their historical peak passenger loads, and are blessed with first-rate cultural amenities (museums, sports teams, live performance venues, etc.) as part of the legacy of their pasts as more prosperous cities.

None of which is to say that Amazon made a mistake by opening its branch offices in two prosperous superstar cities. Tech workers, rationally, prefer to live in cities that feature multiple tech employers because that gives them exit options and flexibility. That, in turn, means that companies that want to hire tech workers like to operate in cities that other tech companies operate in. That means first and foremost the Bay Area, followed by New York and Seattle, followed by DC and perhaps Boston and Austin.

But the overall dynamic of rich cities getting richer while their low-income residents actually get poorer and the legacy infrastructure and housing stock in the midwest steadily deteriorates is profoundly dysfunctional. The wishful thinking that the HQ2 search touched off followed by its predictable endgame shows this isnt a problem thats going to fix itself — federal policymakers need to take a stronger hand in steering these kind of decisions if we want things to ever change.

Democrat Kyrsten Sinema pulls ahead in Arizona Senate race The state still has hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots to count. Marsha Blackburn is an NRA favorite. Her comments on a mass shooting show why. The NRA spent $1.25 million to get her elected. The Arizona, Florida, and Georgia election recounts, explained Republicans are busy filing lawsuits against counting votes in these three closely contested elections. White House press secretary uses fake Infowars video to justify banning CNN reporter Scenes from a dystopia. Its the guns. The guns are the problem. Americas easy access to guns is enabling all these mass shootings. vox-mark Vox Sentences The news, but shorter, delivered straight to your inbox.